tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80634577953766123862011-04-22T01:11:41.567ZFood for thought...Kostashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02273878568006862059noreply@blogger.comBlogger31100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8063457795376612386.post-73416417484013099952007-06-25T13:28:00.001Z2008-11-25T09:03:43.177Z

Today i read two articles(here and here) that made me think.They made me think about several things but mostly they made me think about what is it that Linux really needs to "make it" to the desktop. I thought of making a comparison and viewing this question while keeping osx in mind.Lets have a look at some well known facts (hopefully from a new perspective :) )Linux is an OS that costs

Kostashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02273878568006862059noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8063457795376612386.post-82943712075154859152007-05-26T07:29:00.000Z2007-05-26T08:42:53.028Z

I ve decided to keep away from very controversial issues so this time i am going to ask another question that has been in my mind for a long time.Does FOSS software move fast enough ?This is obviously a very ambiguous question so let me clarify.When i say move i mean evolve , progress , adapt to new needs and new technologies.And when i am saying fast enough i mean compared to its greatest

Kostashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02273878568006862059noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8063457795376612386.post-59004221118350060682007-05-21T13:40:00.000Z2007-05-21T14:25:00.082Z

Is it just me or the online linux press is beginning to get flooded by an endless torrent of pointless articles that usually aren't longer than one or two pages and are obviously written by biased people who most of the time don't even know that much about the subject at hand ? Why do people in the open source community have to be so passionate and leave that passion of theirs to cloud their

Kostashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02273878568006862059noreply@blogger.com6